<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Promote From Within</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.womenonbusiness.com/promote-from-within/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.womenonbusiness.com/promote-from-within/</link>
	<description>Leading Site for Business Women Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.womenonbusiness.com/promote-from-within/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.womenonbusiness.com/?p=1495#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>I particularly like the emphasis upon the utilisation of existing skill sets and the internally-influenced focus upon a woman&#039;s achievements both individually and as part of a business. I very much identify with that.

I do wonder, however, how paralysing a wholly insular perspective may be; I understand that it is important to recognise inner accolades and to prioritise employment opportunities to exisiting employees. Though I think that, as with everything, there is a delicate balance to be struck. As highlighted in this post, sole focus on external campaigns, successes, failures seeks to result in a loss of appreciation for the implemtation of our own skill sets, but a perspective that is too insular fails to consider externally influenced components of a market (such as in SWOT). In addition, neglecting external skill sets alienates potentially fresh and invigorating approaches to a company and doesn&#039;t project the image of your company as a contender, bravely forward-facing the current economic climate.

I wonder how best to implement the internal strategies discussed in this post with a view of the factors outwith a company&#039;s control? Is there room for any middle ground - and if so, how do you sensibly balance the application of internal and external focus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly like the emphasis upon the utilisation of existing skill sets and the internally-influenced focus upon a woman&#8217;s achievements both individually and as part of a business. I very much identify with that.</p>
<p>I do wonder, however, how paralysing a wholly insular perspective may be; I understand that it is important to recognise inner accolades and to prioritise employment opportunities to exisiting employees. Though I think that, as with everything, there is a delicate balance to be struck. As highlighted in this post, sole focus on external campaigns, successes, failures seeks to result in a loss of appreciation for the implemtation of our own skill sets, but a perspective that is too insular fails to consider externally influenced components of a market (such as in SWOT). In addition, neglecting external skill sets alienates potentially fresh and invigorating approaches to a company and doesn&#8217;t project the image of your company as a contender, bravely forward-facing the current economic climate.</p>
<p>I wonder how best to implement the internal strategies discussed in this post with a view of the factors outwith a company&#8217;s control? Is there room for any middle ground &#8211; and if so, how do you sensibly balance the application of internal and external focus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

