NOVEMBER 2012: Women Offered Fewer Career-Advancing “Hot Jobs” Than Men
According to a study from Catalyst (Good Intentions, Imperfect Execution? Women Get Fewer of the Hot Jobs Needed to Advance), women get fewer of the high visibility, mission-critical roles and international experiences (i.e., “hot jobs”) that are necessary to get ahead at global companies.
Some of the highlights from the study include:
- Men lead projects with bigger budgets (more than twice the size of women’s), larger teams (more than three times as many staff), that posed higher risk to the company (30% of men vs. 22% of women), and had more C-suite visibility (35% of men vs. 26% of women) than women.
- Men have roles with more critical responsibility for profit and loss (56% of men vs. 46% of women), management of direct reports (77% of men vs. 70% of women), and budgets over $10 million (30% of men vs. 22% of women) than women.
- Women get fewer international assignments (which are often predictive of advancements) than men, but it’s not because they’re unwilling to relocate. Of those most willing to relocate, more men than women got those assignments (35% vs. 26%), and more women than men were never offered the opportunity (64% vs. 55%).
- More men than women got “hot jobs” after being in formal leadership development programs, and more men were promoted within a year of program completion than women (51% of men vs. 37% of women).
- 62% of respondents to the study said high-profile assignments that gave them leadership experience had the greatest impact on their careers. Just 10% said formal training programs are most impactful.